Oopbuy Finds by Brand: Twelve Indexes and What the Field Misses

Twelve brands, side by side

Every brand page the site publishes, with the count, the match method and the recorded price range. The match column is the one to read first: it tells you how much to trust the number beside it.

Brands recorded in the Oopbuy catalogue
Brand	Listings	Matched by	Cheapest	Dearest
Nike	850	brand field	28.08 CNY	717.6 CNY
Louis Vuitton	702	brand field	72.8 CNY	1029.6 CNY
Gucci	455	brand field	98.18 CNY	2329.6 CNY
Dior	416	brand field	102.96 CNY	3644.16 CNY
Burberry	293	brand field	60.32 CNY	748.8 CNY
Balenciaga	289	brand field	46.8 CNY	1029.6 CNY
Adidas	236	brand field	67.6 CNY	521.4 CNY
Prada	232	brand field	44.72 CNY	950.4 CNY
Chanel	218	brand field	49.92 CNY	3810.56 CNY
Supreme	129	brand field	30 CNY	729 CNY
Fear of God	127	brand field	18.72 CNY	472.32 CNY
Jordan	0	product name	—	—

One brand in this set has no brand value of its own in the catalogue and is matched on product names instead. That page says so in its own words rather than presenting an empty grid.

How to use a brand index without being misled

Five criteria, ordered by how much they change the answer.

Check the match method before the count: A count produced by product-name matching and a count produced by a brand field are different kinds of number. The first is a floor; the second is a filing.
Where to look: The match column in the table above.
Read the price range, not the count: A brand with two hundred rows inside a narrow price band offers less choice than one with sixty rows spread across a wide band.
Where to look: The cheapest and dearest columns.
Assume the brand field is half empty: Across the whole snapshot, roughly half of all listings carry no brand at all. The index's brand field is empty on roughly half of its rows, so a brand page here is a starting point for a search, not a complete catalogue of that label. Where the field cannot resolve a label at all, the page says so and links a search instead.
Where to look: Any category page, and the brand share column on the category index.
Search by product name as a second pass: Two methods producing a negative is stronger evidence than one. Neither is proof, which is why every page here says what it did not find rather than what does not exist.
Where to look: The search box on the index.
Prefer a category page when the object matters more than the name: Brand browsing serves people who know the label. People who know the object are usually faster through the category route.
Where to look: The category index.

Read in this order, a brand index is a good research tool. Read in the other order, it is a source of confident wrong answers.

The twelve brand pages

Ordered by count. Each page carries recorded listings, a price range and the variant-list checks that apply to that label.

Counts reflect the snapshot of 23 Oct 2026. Counts and prices on this page come from one reading of the Oopbuy spreadsheet index on 23 Oct 2026 (11,414 rows indexed then). The index moves; a number here is a record, not a live reading.

Nike 850 items Louis Vuitton 702 items Gucci 455 items Dior 416 items Burberry 293 items Balenciaga 289 items Adidas 236 items Prada 232 items Chanel 218 items Supreme 129 items Fear of God 127 items Jordan 0 items matched by product name, not by a brand field

The brand layer in four numbers

What the brand dimension of this catalogue is worth, stated as figures rather than as an impression.

12Brand pages published

the labels with enough recorded rows to justify an index

47%Listings carrying a brand

approximately, measured across a two-thousand-row sample

850Largest brand

Nike, the widest single label in the index

1Brand matched by name

because its own field is empty in the catalogue

The second number is the one that matters most. A brand layer covering about half a catalogue is useful for finding things and unreliable for proving their absence — which is why every page here repeats it.

Brand index questions

Five answers about brand browsing on this site.

Why only twelve brands?

Because these are the labels with enough recorded rows to make an index page more useful than a single search. Smaller labels are still reachable through the search box and through the category pages.

Is the brand field half empty across the whole catalogue?

Approximately, yes. Measured across a sample of two thousand rows, empty brand values were the single largest group, slightly ahead of the most common brand. The index's brand field is empty on roughly half of its rows, so a brand page here is a starting point for a search, not a complete catalogue of that label. Where the field cannot resolve a label at all, the page says so and links a search instead.

What does "matched by product name" mean?

One label in this catalogue has no brand value of its own and is filed under a parent name. The page for it is built from product-name matches, which finds rows a brand filter cannot but returns them with less precision.

Should I trust a count on a brand page?

As a floor, yes; as a total, no. Every figure on this site was read from the catalogue at a stated time, and every brand page states the method that produced its count.

How do I find something the brand pages miss?

Use the category index for the object type, or search the catalogue by product name. Two methods, two chances of finding a row the brand field never saw.

A brand is one axis; the object is the other

With about half of listings carrying no brand, a category page is often the more reliable route. 11,414 recorded listings sit behind both.

Every brand index on this site